Hovind and the Hendersons

Kent Hovind is fancies himself as a cryptozoologist.  He would love to be able to prove that all dinosaurs were contemporary with humans, hence his self appointed title of Dr Dino.  Hovind even wrote his own profile for Cryptozoological Realms

Cryptozoology is the amateur zoological search for hidden, cyrptus, animals. The most famous creatures of interest include the Loch Ness Monster and Big Foot.  The methodology of cryptozoology is based upon the search for obscure creatures based upon legends and myths.  The cryptozoologist is inspired by the discoveries by mainstream science of creatures once thought extinct (though no one has yet to find a creature which only existed in mythology)

Exploring the unknown is the purpose of science but cryptozoology has an interesting twist - all the myths and legends of a creature are assumed to be based on truth (sound familiar?).  No amount of futile searching will discourage a cryptozoologist because "those legends must be based upon something".

Hovind tries hard to argue his case for Pictures of Dinosaurs in the Twentieth Century.  Now, the first obvious question is "What does this have to do with a young Earth?"  No biologist, 'evolutionist' or otherwise, has ever suggested that all 'ancient' creatures are extinct.  Exactly what is Hovind trying to argue? Hovind devotes an entire section of his presentations to this "living dinosaurs" topic. Like I said, I have no idea why.

Unfortunately for Hovind the 'evidence' presented is easily rebutted  Sea Monster or Shark?  Even other creationists find Hovind's Plesiosaur claims baseless -  Letting Rotting Sharks Lie

Kent Hovind has even co-written a book Jaws, Claws and Dinosaurs on the subject, aimed at children of course.

Hovind also makes a few bucks out of modern dinomania with Fossil Replicas  Pay careful attention to the Paluxy casting - that 'imprint' looks just a little too perfect.  Its ironic that Hovind is flogging faked castings just like the residents of Paluxy did back in the 1930's.  Also, notice Hovind acknowledges that Megalodon is a "close relative of the great white shark [sic]".  Is Hovind implying an evolutionary link?

 Kent and Eric Reply