‘Primal Man’
Primal Man? "This story proves evolution is impossible." Clicking on the link should open a new window. You can then compare the analysis with the online version if you wish.
Chick's web site shows only an extract from a larger work. We enter this story part way through. Dr. Lind appears to be a Young Earth Creationist. Note the age of the sources Chick quote mines from.
Panels 1 and 2
Finlayson: Dr. Lind, are you a physician?
Lind: No, Dr. Finlayson, I'm an anthropologist.
Finlayson: Then evolution is right down your alley.
Lind: Oh, yes ... I'm very familiar with the subject.
Panels 3 and 4
Lind: May I be blunt?
Finlayson: Of course, Dr. Lind.
Lind: I believe evolution is one of the cruelest hoaxes
ever invented!
Panels 4 and 5
Finlayson: Let's go back to Mrs. Leakey's find.
That also shoots down your Bible, which places Adam and Eve around 10,000 years
or less!
Lind: [Leakey's] dating techniques are off!
Finlayson: Of, come on, now! How could you
possibly question the reliability of carbon-14, potassium argon, the uranium
lead method, or other radiometric methods?
Lind: Let me share some little known facts.
Finlayson: Please do!
Panel 6
Lind: * A living mussel was dated using carbon-14 ...
the reading showed it had been dead for 3,000 years
Footnote: * Science, Vol. 141 (1963) Pg. 634 M. Kieth [sic]
and G. Anderson
Finlayson: You mean it was still alive?
Lind: Yes, it was still alive!
Straw man What "Lind" didn't mention is that mollusks and snails do this because they absorbed decayed carbon from the environment.
Panel 7
Lind: Lava rocks were checked in Hawaii by the
potassium argon method ... it was said they were almost 3 billion years old!
Footnote: Funkhouser & Naughton, Journal of
Geophysical Research, Vol. 73, July 15 1968 Pg. 4601
Finlayson: Then that's when the volcano erupted!
Lind: No! ... it erupted in 1801!
False See Fresh
Lava Dated As 22 Million Years Old
Panel 8
Lind: Do you know how long it would take for erosion,
like rain and rivers, to wash away everything above sea level?
Finlayson: Oh, that would take billions of years.
Lind: No! ... just * 14 million years. If the
Earth were one billion years old our continents would have eroded away some 70
times.
Footnote: CREATION: Acts, Facts, [illegible] 1974
by the Creation Research, San Diego, Calif., Pgs.166-167
Straw man “Lind” didn’t mention the accumulation rates counter balance erosion rates.
Panels 9 and 10
Lind: Here's another goodie ... if * 14,300,000 tons
of meteoritic dust falls on the Earth each year ... the same dust falls on the
moon. In 5 billion years, it would be ** 137 feet deep.
Footnote: * Scientific American, Feb. 1960 Pg. 132 **
The Creation Explanation, [illegible] & Segraves, Harold [illegible]
Publisher, Pg. 190 (1975)
Lind: (cont.) How come on the first manned lunar flight
Neil Armstrong's footprint only went into 1/8 inch of dust?
Finlayson: (Gasp) ... It's ... it's a young
moon! I think I'm going to be sick!
Don't panic Dr. Finlayson, for this is just the "moon dust" argument that most Young Earth Creationist have abandoned. Young Earth Creationists even warn against using it;
"This [moon dust accumulation] remained a mystery until new meteor flux measurements in the early 1970's were far lower, consistent with the measured depth of lunar dust and an old age. Creationists apparently were ignorant of these newer measurements that were consistent with an ancient moon, and were rightly criticized for this lapse. Snelling and Rush have reevaluated this issue, and they recommended against using this argument for recent creation." (Faulkner, D.R. 1998, The Current State of Creation Astronomy, Fourth International Conference on Creationism http://www.icr.org/research/df/df-r01.htm)
For further detail see Meteorite Dust and the Age of the Earth
END OF AVAILABLE TEXT