MR HOVIND GOES TO
ARKANSAS
Those who consider individuals like Kent Hovind to be harmless cranks with no ability to affect society at large need to reconsider their position.
On March 21, 2001, Kent Hovind was invited by Representative Jim Holt (R) to testify before a committee of the Arkansas Legislature debating the obscure legislation HB2548. The official title of the Bill was;
AN ACT TO PROHIBIT STATE AGENCIES AND OTHER PUBLIC ENTITIES FROM USING TAX DOLLARS TO PURCHASE OR DISTRIBUTE MATERIAL THAT THAT [sic] THEY KNOW OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN CONTAINS, OR PRESENTS AS FACTUAL, INFORMATION WHICH HAS BEEN PROVEN FALSE OR FRAUDULENT;
Why would Kent Hovind want to be involved with this? After all, Kent Hovind lives in Florida. Maybe it has something to do with the fact these words could come straight from Hovind's own sermons;
"I don't mind if the evolutionists want to convert people to their belief. I do mind if they want to use my tax dollars to do it. And I do mind if they are going to lie to do it." [5]
Firstly, lets understand the politics of Representative Jim Holt (R). He has described himself as a preacher/counselor and his religion as Baptist [7]. There is nothing wrong with that. Holt has also publicly described himself as a creationist [1], and by inviting Kent Hovind to testify we can conclude he is sympathetic to Young Earth Creationism. Kent Hovind describes Jim Holt as being "a close personal friend" [3] Conclusion, Jim Holt is a conservative, Baptist, Young Earth Creationist preacher who is a close friend of Kent Hovind (who is also a conservative, Baptist, Young Earth Creationist preacher).
We have now established the philosophical connection between Kent Hovind and Jim Holt but what is the connection with HB2548? Though there is much denial from both Holt [1] and Hovind [3], the clandestine purpose of HB2548 is obviously to attack the teaching of Evolution Theory in the public education system.
Allow me to put my case;
the Bill describes its intention to outlaw the promotion of "false evidences setforth [sic] in subsection (d) of this section". Close inspection of subsection (d) reveals all the examples are connected with the creation/evolution debate - most examples can be traced to Kent Hovind. All examples are misrepresentations or historical curiosities irrelevant to modern science.
the Bill is concerned with the representation of "theories" - the Bill attempts to legislate away the explanatory capacity of scientific theories (Section 1(c)2) - perfect for undermining the validity of evolution theory (or anything else which contradicts Young Earth Creationism)
close inspection of examples of "theories of concern" show they are all connected with the creation/evolution debate - most examples can be traced to Kent Hovind. All examples are misrepresentations or historical curiosities irrelevant to modern science.
Kent Hovind, whose only claim to fame is his anti evolution sermons, was personally asked to testify by the sponsor of HB2548 (Jim Holt) [3]
During hearings, Representative Denny Altes (R) asked an ACLU representative if she believed in evolution. [1]. Hovind himself recounts "[o]ne of the committee members even asked her if she thought she descended from an ape!" [2]
the Bill has no enforcement mechanisms - the attempt is more a pseudo science smokescreen to score political points rather than any concern about education standards.
20 members of the conservative Christian organization Eagle Forum were present as public observers [1]. What interest would they have in this Bill?
Mary Loye (teacher, member of Eagle Forum) testified that textbooks, especially history, are filled with inaccuracies. She couldn't give any examples. [1]
the Bill applies during "classroom instruction" (section 1(c)) which is the exact same forum which Young Earth Creationists wish to influence.
the Bill gives "instructors" the capacity to invalidate anything within a textbook without oversight (section 1(c)1) - which is perfect for watering down mainstream science by local school boards and teachers.
the Bill redefines science into a more Young Earth Creation friendly form.
Kent Hovind himself stated that "Haeckel's embryo" theory helped spread evolution theory in Germany [1] - odd for a Bill which has nothing to do with evolution/creation.
At a later date, Hovind wrote, "all the lies mentioned in Arkansas HB2548 are being used to support the evolution theory in textbooks around the world. If that offends "believers" in the evolution religion, that is just too bad." [3] All examples are misrepresentations or historical curiosities irrelevant to modern science.
Jack Chick, cartoon evangelist and associate of Kent Hovind, has publicly stated, "The beauty of this approach is that there is no mention in the bill of creationism or evolution as a theory of man's origin. [....] Hovind and the legislators hope to craft a law that can be used in other states to counter some of the unscientific falsehoods that are being taught as scientific fact."
Kent Hovind has clearly influenced this Bill through his connection with Representative Holt, though I make no claim he wrote the text personally. The conclusion rests on these facts;
Kent Hovind admits "[f]or several months, I have been working with several representatives in Arkansas to write a bill that would ban lies in textbooks and tax funded agencies." [2]
some of the material can be traced directly to Kent Hovind's own sermons.
some of the text of the Bill is copied exactly from Jack Chick's evangelist comic book Big Daddy [10]. Jack Chick is heavily connected with Kent Hovind. In fact, Kent Hovind claims he personally re-wrote the latest edition of Big Daddy.[8]
almost all other creationist material is contained in the book In the Beginning by Walt Brown [9]. Kent Hovind uses this book as one of the sources for his sermons.
On the 6th of January, 2002, Kent Hovind said, "I helped Jim Holt write a law which says......" in front of a live audience.[4]
The small remainder of material can be traced to other Young Earth Creationists.
From these observations, we can conclude there is a connection between Kent Hovind and this attempt to influence education in Arkansas.
As a final piece of circumstantial evidence, Hovind wrote an article for his web site [3] countering what he felt was a misrepresentation of HB2548 by an Arkansas newspaper. From personal experience, I can say Hovind rarely responds to his critics. For him to put the effort into writing a rebuttal indicates a high level of personal involvement.
The status of HB2548 is available online here.
Additional opinion can be found here
Thankfully, at the time of writing HB2548 has failed and is in limbo.
Comparison of HB2548 and the Comic Big Daddy
|
BIG DADDY |
HB2548 |
|
HEIDELBERG MAN Built from a jaw bone that was conceded to be quite human. |
i) Heidelberg Man; (ii) Built from a jaw bone that was conceded to be quite human;
|
|
NEBRASKA MAN Scientifically built up from one tooth, later found to be the tooth of an extinct pig. |
(i) Nebraska Man; (ii) Scientifically built up from one tooth and later learned to be the tooth of an extinct pig;
|
|
PILTDOWN MAN The jawbone turned out to belong to a modern ape |
(i) Piltdown Man; (ii) The jawbone actually belonged to a modern ape;
|
|
PEKING MAN Supposedly 500,000 years old, but all the evidence has disappeared |
(i)
Peking Man;
|
|
NEANDERTHAL MAN At the Int'l Congress of Zoology (1958) Dr. A.J.E. Cave said his examination showed this famous skeleton found in France over 50 years ago is that of an old man who suffered from arthritis. |
(i) Neanderthal Man; (ii) At the International Congress of Zoology (1958) Dr. A. J. E. Cave said his examination showed that the famous Neanderthal skeleton found in France over 50 years ago is that of an old man who suffered from arthritis;
|
|
CRO-MAGNON MAN One of the earliest and best established fossils is at best equal in physique and brain capacity to modern man ... so what's the difference? |
i) Cro-Magnon Man; (ii) One of the earliest and best-established [sic] fossils is at least equal in physique and brain capacity to modern man; |
Carl Marychurch
Last updated: November 2004
[1] Blomeley, S. 2001 Panel labels evolution as theory Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, March 22, 2001 accessed at http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3abab40729a1.htm [July 2001]
[2] Hovind, K. 2001, The Every-Once-in-Awhile Newsletter, Spring, 2001 Vol. II, Issue 1, http://www.drdino.com/Ministry/newsletter.jsp [August 2001]
[3] Hovind, K. 2001, What is all the commotion in Arkansas? accessed at http://www.drdino.com/cse.asp?pg=articles&specific=19 [August 2001]
[4] http://www.cbbc.net/RS/ 6 Jan 2002 Session #3 @ 29:15 [Feb 2002]
[5] Hovind, K. 1999, Creation Seminar Transcript 4a http://www.drdino.com/SeminarOnline/Text/Transcript4.jsp [2001]
[6] Chick, Jack, 2001, Kansas Board Vacillates Over Text Book Lies http://www.chick.com/bc/2001/lies.asp [April 2003]
[7] www.arkleg.state.ar.us/scripts/ablr/members/members3b.asp?mcode=5 [August 2001]
[8] http://www.drdino.com/products/books/creationtracts.jsp [2001]
[9] Brown, W. In the Beginning http://www.creationscience.com/ [2001]
[10] Chick, J Big Daddy Chick Publications http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0055/0055_01.asp